August 20, 2007

Why become a referee?

Filed under: Uncategorized — Blackjack @ 7:58 pm

A friend of mine who reads the blog from Britain and who is a qualified FA referee has sent me this dissertation he did for a referees promotion evening he ran a few months back. This was in response to my asking him WHY (he become a referee in the first place)?? 

………………………………………………………….

I never actually wanted to be a referee growing up as a teenager. It wasn’t something that appealed to me.

But when I realised I wasn’t going to get to the heights I’d hoped for as a player, my father, who was a referee, made me aware of a referee’s course.

ref shields 

I thought I’d give it a go because most of the referees for the games that I’d played in seemed to be old men.

I honestly thought there was a need for some younger people to be involved. I also thought that younger refs might get more respect because they might be fitter and be a bit more in tune with the game.

So me and a few mates went down and passed the course when I was about 19 years old.

Even back then leagues were so desperately short of officials, so you got games straight away.

And if you had an aptitude for it then you got pushed through the ranks quite quickly.

I got a lot of pleasure from refereeing right from the start. Every time you walk out onto the field, the FA are entrusting you with that particular game.

For a young lad of 19, that gives you a feeling of worth. It made me feel quite responsible and that’s the message I’m trying to get across.

When the game goes smoothly, you get a good feeling of satisfaction; that you’ve managed 22 people for 80 or 90 minutes for a successful game of football.  

I got more satisfaction from that than being involved in a team that might have lost 5-0 on a Sunday morning.

On top of that you get all the benefits of maintaining your fitness, a good camaraderie amongst the refereeing community and now it can be a full-time career.

I never realised that when I started out.

At local level there is a lack of respect sometimes for those that have decided to become referees.

You get people who would never do it themselves and would rather stand there and criticise from the sidelines.

We have to try and educate people about the importance of referees. If we’re short of referees at local level it will effect the quality of refs in six or seven years at the top level.

referee_anonymous_203_203x152

There are so many games that are being refereed by unqualified officials which is doing harm to the game.

I know from when I played there is nothing better than when a referee turns up who is neutral and qualified.

It’s just like having proper nets in the goal or having a decent ball; it’s part and parcel of what you need to have a good game.

I’ve never been experienced any violence as a referee but then being 6′3″ and 15 1/2 stone probably helps!

Not that you need to be that. You need to have a strong personality and a belief in yourself.

Being a good referee is all down to the way you manage people and how you communicate with them.

You need to be fit and you need to be dedicated. If you’re a young person you need to aspire high but keep your feet on the ground and be prepared to learn and listen.

5 Comments

  1. I like it!
    Quote…Being a good referee is all down to the way you manage people and how you communicate with them.
    Some of our referees who seem to think that they are the centre of attention might like to think about that one.
    The best games for a referee are the ones that, after the game, everyone is talking about something else.

    Comment by A Whisper — August 21, 2007 @ 7:55 am

  2. Jim Anderton used to say to me ” Brian your best game is when no one has heard the whistle .

    Precisely….and I can almost hear the brogue in him saying it too!! :-) BJ

    Comment by Brian Roberts — August 21, 2007 @ 3:20 pm

  3. that’s why FFT has to follows Hockey’s Model (30 years old) where all clubs are required to officiate games or risk suspesion or lose points.
    this will teach all of us, players and officials the rules of the game, it will also allow some of players to receive some of their own medicine

    Comment by tater31 — August 21, 2007 @ 4:33 pm

  4. the hockey model is not a smart solution, while it may work for hockey, they have all of their matches at the same venue, it would be harder to apply to football where there are grounds all over the place. the hockey governing body are probably too lazy to spend the time and money training referees when they know they can force players to do he same job, albeit at a much lower standard.

    Comment by el diablo — August 21, 2007 @ 11:04 pm

  5. I too was a big fan of the hockey model until I recently was talking to a club administrator who explained their club was often fined for not supplying officials..They are suggesting hockey go down the road of paying people to officiate..

    The grass may seem greener on the other side of the fence..but it too needs to be mowed..possibly more often if its greener..

    Comment by interested spectator — August 22, 2007 @ 9:28 am

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.